| e9ukzruzxi | Date: Marti, 2013-12-31, 6:11 PM | Message # 1 |
|
General
Group: Utilizatori
Messages: 2770
Status: Offline
| Why the PUMA a very good idea
This morning I reading a rash of reports on the new Personal Urban Mobility and Accessibility vehicle (PUMA) that had been unveiled yesterday by GM and Segway. While I'm generally harsh on proposals for vehicles with plugs since i question their fundamental economics, the PUMA appears maybe it's a winner. What's more, it appears like it would be a great time to get.
My big problem with plugins has long been the prospect of using batteries to shift around 200 pounds of passengers as well as a couple thousand pounds of vehicle at highway speeds. Which has a curb weight of 300 pounds and space for just two passengers that don't mind close quarters, the PUMA blows the cost-effective arguments out on water, as would any solution having a passenger to vehicle weight ratio of a.
For quite some time now, Segway's battery supplier happens to be Valence Technology (VLNC). They manufacture a highend Liion battery (lithiumironphosphate chemistry) with drawn rave performance reviews from endusers who've commented in my small articles. If Segway is as very pleased with the Valence batteries given that the endusers I listen to, there isn't really reason to imagine if you have a competitor could undercut a longstanding business relationship and edge Valence with the sidelines.
If your PUMA is even moderately successful, even tho it's a companymaker for Valence.
Your opinion tends to be that Valence's stock is quite on your expensive side. With it's status for operating losses and weak financial condition, I have a difficult experience justifying market capitalization of $240 million. But alternatively the cause of trying out technology driven companies could be the potential a single event might move a stock from overvalued to undervalued in your blink associated with an eye, and also Relating to <a href=http://www.kabulguide.net/nk5.html>http://www.kabulguide.net/nk5.html</a> to confess that it is more pleasing stock today personal computer was yesterday. I recognize many Segway owners usually are not happy whatsoever using the cost and longevity the Valence batteries. Nearly $2,000 to change your scooter batteries every couple of years is known as a <a href=http://bcalmpoweryoga.com/Images/nb.html>ニューバランス レディース</a> bit ridiculous, no? I certainly wouldn't purchase Valence stock for those sole reason the pair were helpful to power this prototype. First, it's going to be some time before it's always even decided should the PUMA goes beyond the prototype phase. Second, even when this will, you don't have guarantee <a href=http://www.zippy.pt/demo/ugg.html>http://www.zippy.pt/demo/ugg.html</a> the PUMA would use Valence batteries.
[url=http://www.ruraluniv.ac.in/logs/rayban.html]レイバン コックピット[/url]
|
| |
|
|
